Original Decision

http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?case=D2022-2669

Full case details for siyahsuperga.com filed at WIPO(D2022-2669) under UDRP on 2022-12-09 by Basic Net S P Abasic Trademark S R L with panelist John Swinson resulted in a Transfer decision.

UDRP.Tools ID102160
Domain(s):siyahsuperga.com, storesuperga.com, supergaargentina.com, supergaau.com, supergabarcelona.com, supergabelgie.com, supergabr.com, supergabuty.com, supergacipo-outlet.com, supergadanmark.com, superga-denmark.com, supergaemportugal.com, supergagr.com, superga-greece.com, supergahrvatska.com, supergahungary.com, supergahvitesko.com, supergaie.com, supergaisrael.com, supergaistanbul.com, supergaitaliaoutlet.com, supergamagyarorszag.com, superga-malaysia.com, supergamexico.com, superganorge.com, supergaonlineschweiz.com, supergaonlineshop.com, supergaoutletargentina.com, supergaoutletmadrid.com, superga-ph.com, supergaph.com, supergaphshop.com, superga-pl.com, supergaroma.com, superga-romania.com, supergasale.com, supergasalegreece.com, supergasalesnz.com, supergaschwarz.com, supergasg.com, supergashoesindonesia.com, supergashoesireland.com, supergashoesmalaysia.com, supergashoesnz.com, supergashoesphilippines.com, supergashoesportugal.com, supergashoessale.com, supergashoessingapore.com, supergaskleppolska.com, supergasmexico.com, supergasneakerscanada.com, supergasneakers.com, supergasouthafrica.com, supergastockists.com, supergastoredeutschland.com, supergastoremadrid.com, superga-sverige.com, supergasverige.com, supergatenisky.com, supergatennarit.com, supergatokyo.com, supergaturkiyemagazalari.com, supergauk.com, supergausashoes.com, supergawhitecanada.com, supergawhiteshoes.com, supergawhitesneakers.com, superga-za.com, superga2750.com, tiendassupergachile.com, tiendasupergamadrid.com, ucuzsuperga.com
Decision Outcome:Transfer
Decision Date:2022-12-09
Venue:WIPO
Case No:D2022-2669
Panelists:John Swinson
Complainant Name:Basic Net S P Abasic Trademark S R L
Complainant Locale:it
Complainant Rep:Sindico E Associate Italy
Complainant Rep Firm:
Respondent Name:Alexander Richteralexander Rothschildbirgit Kalbbrigitte Saengerclaudia Rothsteinclient Care Web Commerce Communicationsdieter Hoffmanndomain Admin Whoisprotection Ccjulia Loewekalb Danielkatharina Naumann
Respondent Locale:my
Respondent Rep:None
Respondent Rep Firm:
Respondent Replied:No
RDNH Found:No

Case Notes

There are no notes for this case yet.

You Must Be Logged In to Add a Case Note

Cited Cases:

CasePartiesDomainPanelistsCited Before DiscussionCited in Discussion
D2020-2676Cox Enterprises v. Miguel Delselajctoday.comWilliam F HamiltonX
D2021-0603The Clorox Company v. Melissa Rosenbergwhoisguard Protected Whoisguard Enos Villanuevayang Mingcloroxac.shopWilson Pinheiro JaburX
D2022-0942Alpargatas Europe S L Ualpargatas S A v. Client Care Web Commerce Communicationssabrina Diederich Client Care Web Commerce Communicationshavaianas-belgie.comAssen AlexievX
D2022-0908New Balance Athletics v. Client Care Web Commerce Communicationsnbbrasilia.comFlip PetillionX