Original Decision

http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/search/text.jsp?case=D2010-1365

Full case details for xenical120.com filed at WIPO(D2010-1365) under UDRP on 2010-10-21 by Hoffmann La Roche with panelist Craig Edward Stein resulted in a Transfer decision.

UDRP.Tools ID35263
Domain(s):xenical120.com
Decision Outcome:Transfer
Decision Date:2010-10-21
Venue:WIPO
Case No:D2010-1365
Panelists:Craig Edward Stein
Complainant Name:Hoffmann La Roche
Complainant Locale:us
Complainant Rep:Lathrop Gage Llp Usa
Complainant Rep Firm:
Respondent Name:Barbara Harris
Respondent Locale:us
Respondent Rep:None
Respondent Rep Firm:
Respondent Replied:Yes
RDNH Found:No

Case Notes

There are no notes for this case yet.

You Must Be Logged In to Add a Case Note

Cited Cases:

CasePartiesDomainPanelistsCited Before DiscussionCited in Discussion
D2009-0320Research In Motion v. Privacy Lockedbackberry.comTony WilloughbyX
D2009-0361Tpi Holdings v. Carmen Armengolautotradertransactions.comDana HavilandX
D2009-0568Tpi Holdings v. Elaine Noesupport-autotrader.comHarrie R SamarasX
D2009-0635F Hoffmann La Roche Ag v. Protected Domain Services Mediatec Cotamiflu75.comEva FiammenghiX
D2008-1138Hoffmann La Roche v. Alisia Uzunaccutane-prescription-online.infoJohn E KiddX
D2007-1722Accor S A v. Kristen Hoerlnovotelsnig.comAlan LimburyX
D2007-1769Maison Bouchard Pere Et Fils v. Bouchardpereetfils Com Domain Administrationbouchardpereetfils.comAlan LimburyX
D2007-1814Hoffmann La Roche v. Samuel Teodorekaccutane-buy.comJeffrey D SteinhardtX
D2006-0197F Hoffmann La Roche Ag v. Stoyan Stoyanovnewstamiflu.comIan BlackshawX
D2006-0629Hoffmann La Roche v. Aneko Bohnerbuyaccutane.comRobert A BadgleyX
D2006-0795Sanofi Aventis v. Britny Spearsambien-10-mg.infoThomas HoerenX
D2006-1102Sanofi Aventis v. Impact Healthcaretakeambien.comAnders JansonX
D2006-1123Eli Lilly And Company v. Cybernet Marketing Antoine Tardifcialis-medication.comBrigitte JoppichX
D2005-0061Fresh Intellectual Properties v. 800network Com800-flowers.comDavid H BernsteinX
D2005-0234National Football League Players Association v. Trademarknflpa.comCraig Edward SteinX
D2005-1099Lilly Icos v. Selfbuy-cialis-tadalafil.comJonathan TurnerX
D2005-1287American Media Operations International Federation Of Bodybuildersmr Olympia v. Tim Harringtonmrolympia.comCraig Edward SteinX
D2005-1288Hoffmann La Roche v. Whoisguardtamiflu.netJay SimonX
D2004-0321Societe Des Hotels Meridien v. Modern Cayman Web Developmentlemeridian.comPeter G NitterX
D2004-0784Pfizer v. Jg A K A Josh Greenpfizerforwoman.comTerrell C BirchX
D2004-0794Lilly Icos v. Tudor Burden Burden Marketingcialisapcalis.comNathalie DreyfusX
D2003-0400Casio Keisanki Kabushiki Kaisha Casio Computer Co v. Jongchan Kimcasioshop.netAlan Limbury, Clive L Elliott, Boh Young HwangX
D2003-0465Berlitz Investment v. Stefan Tinculescuberlitzsucks.comMichael A AlbertX
D2003-0721Hoffmann La Roche v. Eric Kaiser A K A Edrugnetaccutane-acne-treatments-medication.comJohn R KeysX
D2003-0793Hoffmann La Roche v. 1 Viagra Propecia Xenical More Online Pharmacyviagra-propecia-xenical.comLawrence K NodineX
D2002-0972Top Driver v. Benefits Benefitstopdriver.comDavid H BernsteinX
D2001-0004America Online v. Anson Chanicqroaming.comAlan LimburyX
D2001-0505Britannia Building Society v. Britannia Fraud Preventionbritanniabuildingsociety.orgDavid H BernsteinX
D2000-0009Talk City v. Michael Robertsontalk-city.comDavid H BernsteinX
D2000-0847Madonna Ciccone P K A Madonna v. Dan Parisi Madonna Commadonna.comMark Partridge, James W Dabney, David E SorkinX
D2000-1240Google v. Jimmy Siavesh Behainwwwgoogle Comwwwgoogle.comJeffrey M SamuelsX
D2000-1374America Online v. Xianfeng Fuicq502.comHugues G RichardX