Full case details for supremo.com filed at WIPO(D2001-1357) under UDRP on 2002-02-15 by Supremo N V S A with panelists Ian Barker, Dawn Osborne, and David E Sorkin resulted in a Complaint denied decision. The panel found Reverse Domain Name Hijacking.

UDRP.Tools ID	46284
Domain(s):	supremo.com
Decision Outcome:	Complaint denied
Decision Date:	2002-02-15
Venue:	WIPO
Case No:	D2001-1357
Panelists:	Ian Barker, Dawn Osborne, David E Sorkin
Complainant Name:	Supremo N V S A
Complainant Locale:	be
Complainant Rep:	Mr A Yves Tombeur
Complainant Rep Firm:
Respondent Name:	Supremo Com
Respondent Locale:
Respondent Rep:	Esqwire Com Law Firm Of Cherry Hill Nj Us A The Respondent Was Shown In A Whois Database As With The Same Address As That Of Mr A Tella No Explanation Has Been Offered As To Why Registration Was Not Effected In The Name Of Mr A Tella
Respondent Rep Firm:
Respondent Replied:	Yes
RDNH Found:	Yes

Case	Parties	Domain	Panelists	Cited in Discussion
D2001-0154	Kcts Television v. Get On The Web	kcts.com	Ian Barker, Richard W Page, David E Sorkin	X
D2001-0217	Koninklijke Kpn N V v. Telepathy	moneyplanet.com	Ian Barker, Diane Thilly Cabell, Charles Gielen	X
D2001-0814	Village Resorts v. Steven Lieberman	superfares.net	Ian Barker	X
D2000-0527	Vz Vermoegenszentrum Ag v. Anything Com	vz.com	Ian Barker, Thomas M Legler, David E Sorkin	X
D2000-1224	Sydney Opera House Trust v. Trilynx	sydneyoperahouse.net	Alan Limbury	X

Domain	Date	Complainant	Respondent	Panelist(s)	Decision	Original Decision
gr8.com	2006-03-24	Gr8 Industries B V	Graffito Active8 Partnership	Ross Wilson	Complaint denied	WIPO D2005-1341
sallie.com	2004-10-18	Sallie Mae	Michele Dinoia	Kiyoshi Tsuru	Complaint denied	WIPO D2004-0648
hello.com	2002-04-27	Hellohola S A	Idealab	Ian Barker, Frederick M Abbott, Christopher P Tootal	Complaint denied	WIPO D2002-0089
gloria.com	2002-04-26		Internet Development	Ian Barker, Cecil O D Branson, Milton L Mueller	Complaint denied with dissenting opinion	WIPO D2002-0056