Original Decision

http://www.adrforum.com/DomainDecisions/1958126.htm

Full case details for hushpuppyphilippines.com filed at NAF(1958126) under UDRP on 2021-09-10 by Wolverine World Wide with panelist Nicholas Smith resulted in a Transferred decision.

UDRP.Tools ID92361
Domain(s):hushpuppyphilippines.com, hushpuppiesbelgie.com, hushpuppiessg.com, hushpuppynz.com, hushpuppiessouthafrica.com, hushpuppiesindia.com, kedschile.com, kedsshoesau.com, kedsshoesaustralia.com, keds-australia.com, kedssingapores.com, kedsshoesuk.com, kedsuk.com, teniskedmexico.com, kedsespana.com, kedsshoesnz.com, sauconyskonorge.com, sauconysouthafrica.com, sauconymalaysia.com, sauconyshoessg.com, sauconyfactoryau.com, sauconyphilippines.com, sauconysaleus.com, sauconynl.com, saucony-nederland.com, saucony-malaysia.com, sauconyskodk.com, sauconycanadasale.com, saucony-ireland.com, sauconysko-tilbud.com, sauconymalaysiastore.com, sauconyshoesindia.com, sperryphilippines.com, sperryaustraliasale.com, sperryindia.com, sperryaustralia.com, sperryboatshoesuk.com, sperrysingaporeoutlet.com, sperrysingapores.com, sperryshoessingapor.com, sperryshoes-singapore.com, sperryphilippinessale.com, sperrycanadaoutlet.com, merrellphilippinessale.com, merrellphilippinesoutlet.com, merrellshoesphilippines.com, merrellargentinaonline.com, merrellaustraliau.com, merrellcanadasale.com, merrellsandalsdublin.com, merrellphilippinesph.com, merrellshoesph.com, merrellindiasale.com, merrelluksale.com, merrellsingaporesg.com, merrellskodame.com, merrellwandelschoenen.com, merrell-belgie.com, merrellsandalsnz.com, merrelloutletsingapore.com
Decision Outcome:Transferred
Decision Date:2021-09-10
Venue:NAF
Case No:1958126
Panelists:Nicholas Smith
Complainant Name:Wolverine World Wide
Complainant Locale:us
Complainant Rep:Malaina J Weldy
Complainant Rep Firm:Warner Norcross Judd Llp
Respondent Name:Claudia Nagel Delores Bell Karolin Fried Giuseppina Hoflein Per Arild Jon Arvid Kirketeig Paul Hagl Henning Grund Dirk Brauer Anthony Judd Dominik Vogel Shawn Recio Birgit Werfel Phillipp Urner Michael Scholz Super Privacy Service C O D
Respondent Locale:
Respondent Rep:None
Respondent Rep Firm:
Respondent Replied:No
RDNH Found:No

Case Notes

There are no notes for this case yet.

You Must Be Logged In to Add a Case Note

Cited Cases:

CasePartiesDomainPanelistsCited Before DiscussionCited in Discussion
1659965General Motors v. Mike Leegmmdi.comSandra J FranklinX
1656166General Motors v. Domain Admin Privacy Protection Service Privacyprotect Orggm-uzbekistan.comHo Hyun NahmX
1653187Microsoft v. Thong Tran Thanhminecraft4free.usPaul M DeciccoX
1621573Kohler Co v. Privacy Servicekohlersinks.comNeil BrownX
1613011State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Dale Andersonstatefarmforum.comCharles K MccotterX
1612750Xylem And Xylem Ip Holdings v. Yinsi Baohu Yi Kaiqi Hidden By Whois Privacy Protection Servicexylemchina.comHo Hyun NahmX
914943Trip Network Dba Cheap Tickets v. Sigfredo Alvieracheapticketscancun.comDaniel B BanksX
780200Aol v. Jordan Gerberglotteryaol.comKendall C ReedX
741828Hanna Barbera Productions v. Entertainment Commentarieshannabarbera.comMichael A AlbertX
157287Egalaxy Multimedia v. On Hold By Owner Ready To Expirenakednewsradio.comCarolyn Marks JohnsonX
1768542Balenciaga Sa v. Ling Linibalenciaga.comDavid E SorkinX
1760517Bittrex v. Wuxi Yilianlbittrex.comRichard W HillX
1818749Directv v. The Pearline Groupdirecttvdealsnow.comPaul M DeciccoX